date: Fri May 2 11:47:01 2008 from: Tim Osborn subject: Re: WET dataset(s) to: Ian Harris harry - the wetsyn netCDF file seems full of crap! stripey like when you previously combined 0.5 normals with 2.5 anomalies, though somehow much worse! No variability in Jan or Apr, stripey in Jul and Oct. Tim At 10:16 02/05/2008, you wrote: Hi I've made a complete run of half-degree synthetic-only WET to be used with the observed + 2.5-degree synthetic WET as follows: Option 1: No obs after 1989 Use 1901-1989 decadal files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/ wet/wet_final/ Use 1990-2006 decadal files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/ wet/wet_final_synthetic/ (if you'd like single files for each period let me know) Option 2: synthetic only Use all files from /cru/cruts/version_3_0/secondaries/wet/ wet_final_synthetic/ Cheers Harry Ian "Harry" Harris Climatic Research Unit School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ United Kingdom