cc: alex.haxeltine@uea.ac.uk, "'Mike Hulme'" , "'Vanessa McGregor'" date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 17:35:41 +0200 from: bo.kjellen@environment.ministry.se subject: Ang: final TORs and invitation letter to: "Emily" Dear Emily, and all, Thanks for a good paper reflecting a very constructive discussion last Thursday. I have just a few comments on the different documents: General background: Topic 1, next by last sentence of "Information to be provided"- I think it would be better to write "What are the impacts on European competitiveness and international trade?" I have no view on author for topic 1.b) Topic 3, Brief description: I suggest to drop the words "This topic addresses" and just start "Global emissions control etc." Information to be provided, last line, last word, replace equity with justice - but both are fine words, I have no strong feelings! Justification for workshop schedule. Do we need "justification", sounds defensive. I suggest "Comments on etc". Last sentence should read "This session will take up a large part of the final afternoon". Invitation: Reasons to attend: first para : "fora" is already plural, but often used mistakenly in singular instead of "forum". So no e at the end. second para: drop "excellent" . Can we guarantee that everybody is excellent, and does it only apply to scientists? Finally I have noted that I appear both as "Tyndall" and as "Ministry of Environment" in different places. If Tyndall accepts I would be happy to be included in your team, but I leave the decision to you. Once again thanks, great job Cheers Bo "Emily" 2004-07-05 14:40 "'Mike Hulme'" Bo Kjellén/ENVIRONMENT/MINISTRY@RK Kopia: "'Vanessa McGregor'" Blank: Ärende: final TORs and invitation letter En bilaga med namnet EFIEA WS2 TORS FINAL DRAFT5.7.04.DOC har tagits bort. En bilaga med namnet EFIEA_WORKSHOP2_INVITATION_DRAFT2.6_EB.DOC har tagits bort. Dear Mike, Alex and Bo Please I would be grateful if you could have a glance at the final TORs and the invitation letter and let me know if you have any comments/queries by this afternoon, thank you. Just a note: I have added a couple of scientists to the list of invitees previously omitted from WS2 list, including Saleem Hucq (IIED) and Mans Nilsson (SEI) (both attending WS1). I though that they are good bridging people, Saleem for adaptation (to give that topic some more weighting) and Mans as an author for WS1 - so will have been involved already in the concepts, he is good at conceptual thinking and contributes a lot. However, if you think otherwise please just cut them from the list. With them included the list is at 45 stakeholders. We also need to make a final decision on who is to author paper 1b. Marcel is still keen on Carraro, what do we think about that? Cheers Emily