date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:40:34 -0700 from: Tom Wigley subject: Re: MAGICC/SCENGEN to: Mike Hulme Mike, A quick reply -- SCENGEN is also owned by me. All of the conceptual and intellectual input has been mine. You and the people who have worked for you have really been little more than technicians or software engineers. Tom. _______________________ Mike Hulme wrote: > > Tom, > > I was caught up in a Tyndall management meeting all of Monday when you were > in CRU - although Rachel summarised some of the discussions that you had. > > It would be useful to talk on the phone so we can get straight what we want > to use MAGICC/SCENGEN for in Tyndall and also be clear with you about what > you are happy us using it for. A MoU might be the best way. Also to be > clear about credits as you say - I always aim to make it very clear to > people that the MAGICC model is "owned" by you and Sarah. > > Anyway, to check - are you around about 4pm (GMT) on either Thursday or > Friday this week for us to talk on the phone? I am sure it would help if > we could do so. > > Thanks, > > Mike > > At 11:02 28/11/02 -0700, you wrote: > >Mike, > > > >This is just to remind you that I will be in CRU for most of Monday Dec. > >16th. > > > >We need to discuss MAGICC/SCENGEN. It seems that a number of people are > >interested in this. However, the new version is now entirely the work of > >myself and my software colleague, Seth McGinnis, on the SCENGEN side, > >and me and Sarah on the MAGICC side. If Tyndall wishes to use the new > >version, we need to have a formal 'Memorandum Of Understanding' about > >its use -- not least because of the rather cavalier attitude you seem to > >have about giving credit where it is due. > > > >There are others issues related to the funding sources for the new > >version that make it difficult for me to allow others access to the > >code, at least for some time. > > > >Tom.