date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:28:16 +0100 from: "Palmer Dave Mr (LIB)" subject: RE: ICO request [FOI_08-23] to: "Tim Osborn" Tim, Michael and I are putting together a draft response to submit to the ICO when requested and we are reviewing the 'evidence' that supports our case. I don't seem to have a copy of the correspondence that you mention from Jouzel, Solomina & Ammann) that you mention below. Nor can I find any correspondence from John Mitchell regarding his attitude to the release of the requested information - could you have a look at your files and forward the correspondence to me please? We are meeting Monday afternoon so if I could get it before then it would be great - understand that this is very late notice so no worries if you can't get to it. Many thanks in advance. Cheers, Dave >-----Original Message----- >From: Tim Osborn [mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk] >Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 11:36 AM >To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB); Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD) >Cc: Briffa Keith Prof (ENV); Jones Philip Prof (ENV) >Subject: RE: ICO request [FOI_08-23] > >Hi again, > >I've put together the attached table listing all those named in the >FOI request or who we have relevant correspondence with, together >with their response to our enquiries about confidentiality/release of >materials. > >It is based on the responses from colleagues that I sent you last >12th May, plus 3 further responses (Jouzel, Solomina, Ammann) that >arrived after that. > >Hope this suffices. > >I've got hard copy of typical correspondence, plus hard copy of the 3 >further responses regarding confidentiality. Should I send these via >internal mail to Dave? What is your internal address? Just "Dave >Palmer, LIB"? > >Cheers > >Tim > >At 10:12 23/04/2009, Palmer Dave Mr \(LIB\) wrote: >>Tim [et al], >>I'd like to add my thanks as well - I've had a quick view of the >>document and will provide comments suggestions in the near >future. Rom >>my perspective, it's a question of providing both context and reasons >>why the information 'fits' within the exemptions that we have cited so >>the evidence/context needs to align/support those exemptions. >>The other piece of work that I will attend to is mapping the request >>onto EIR, should the ICO decree that we must go that route... >> >>Cheers, Dave >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD) >> >Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:01 AM >> >To: Osborn Timothy Dr (ENV); Palmer Dave Mr (LIB) >> >Cc: Briffa Keith Prof (ENV); Jones Philip Prof (ENV) >> >Subject: RE: ICO request >> > >> >Tim, >> > >> >Thanks very much for this. Dave and I have had to move our >> >meeting yesterday from this morning to 7th May, so if you need >> >abit more time to let us have any further information you >now have it! >> > >> >Regards >> > >> >Michael >> > >> > >> >Michael McGarvie >> >Director of Faculty Administration >> >Faculty of Science >> >Room 0.22B >> >University of East Anglia >> >Norwich NR4 7TJ >> > >> >tel: 01603 593229 >> >fax: 01603 593045 >> > >> >m.mcgarvie@uea.ac.uk >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Tim Osborn [mailto:t.osborn@uea.ac.uk] >> >Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:05 PM >> >To: Palmer Dave Mr (LIB); Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD) >> >Cc: Briffa Keith Prof (ENV); Jones Philip Prof (ENV) >> >Subject: RE: ICO request >> > >> >Hi Dave and Michael, >> > >> >attached is a replacement to the draft that Phil sent earlier. I >> >think it covers items 1, 3, 4 and 6 on the list below, though we >> >could perhaps expand on 6 if necessary. The previous letters from >> >Susan Solomon and our co-authors should of course accompany this as >> >support. Note that Keith has not had a chance to see any of this >> >because he had to go to Liverpool at urgent notice last Thursday due >> >to family illness and now bereavement and so is, >> >understandably, still away. >> > >> >I have collated some examples for item 5. Phil is taking a look to >> >see if they are a fair representation of the type of material. I'll >> >pass these on to you tomorrow (they are all hard copy). >> > >> >I'll make a table/list for item 2 tomorrow morning and >email it to you. >> > >> >Best wishes >> > >> >Tim >> > >> >At 15:01 17/04/2009, Mcgarvie Michael Mr \(ACAD\) wrote: >> >> >> >>I hope that you have all had a really good Easter break. >> >> >> >>I have arranged to meet up with Dave Palmer next Thursday >(23rd April) >> >>to progress the response to the ICO. If there is any >information from >> >>the action list (included below for ease of reference) >that you could >> >>send me in advance, I would be grateful. >> >> >> >>Many thanks >> >> >> >>Michael >> >> >> >> >> >>ACTION LIST: >> >> >> >>1. Details of web links for the copy of the final IPCC report >> >as well as >> >>links to drafts and comments on drafts. >> >> >> >>2. List of members of the working group - I will then do a >table that >> >>shows who replied to Tim's email. >> >> >> >>3. A description/statement of the process followed by IPCC authors, >> >>including that much of this was by round table discussion >> >> >> >>4. Any IPCC guidance that was given to authors and how they were >> >>expected to operate. >> >> >> >>5. Some examples of the types of email exchanges that took >place that >> >>could go to the ICO >> >> >> >>6. Statement clarifying the possible damage to international >> >>collaboration if email exchanges of this kind can be made publicly >> >>available >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >