date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:35:44 +0200 from: Eduardo Zorita subject: (no subject) to: t.osborn@uea.ac.uk Dear Tim, I send you two figures with the time series of solar irradiance. In the first (tim.pdf) the TSI used in ERIk are compared to the Lean et al data and the Crowley data multiplied by the factor 4/(1-.3). As you can see, Crowley underestimate the variability and we overestimate it relative to the Lean et al data. In the second figure (bard.pdf) the ERIk TSI forcingis compared to other proposed TSI time series. Further figures to support the ERIK TSI series are the comparison of the Central England SAT time series, and of the NCEP and Jones NH mean SAT in 1948-2000 cheers eduardo Attachment Converted: "c:\documents and settings\tim osborn\my documents\eudora\attach\tim.pdf" Attachment Converted: "c:\documents and settings\tim osborn\my documents\eudora\attach\bard.pdf" Attachment Converted: "c:\documents and settings\tim osborn\my documents\eudora\attach\cet_erik.pdf" Attachment Converted: "c:\documents and settings\tim osborn\my documents\eudora\attach\p.pdf"