cc: Caspar Ammann , Ben Santer date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:46:24 +0100 from: Sarah Raper subject: Re: responses to: Tom Wigley Dear Tom, I have reread the ms and all responses and am impressed/amused by them. Very good. I am not so close to this and like the paper more with each read - I think the additions do help. Only one trivial comment - page 15 para starting 'From the maximum..' Ist line 'the implied sensitivities are:' add climate to read 'the implied climate sensitivities are;' Hopefully Robock is happy with the 3 reviews - ie won't send it out again. Many thanks for all your work. Sarah On 26 Oct 2004, at 06:23, Tom Wigley wrote: >