cc: susan.solomon@noaa.gov, john.f.mitchell@metoffice.gov.uk, jean.jouzel@lsce.ipsl.fr, Eystein Jansen <Eystein.Jansen@geo.uib.no>, Jonathan Overpeck <jto@u.arizona.edu>, David Rind <drind@giss.nasa.gov>, Bette Otto-Bleisner <ottobli@ncar.ucar.edu>, cddhr@giss.nasa.gov, joos <joos@climate.unibe.ch>, Ricardo Villalba <ricardo@lab.cricyt.edu.ar>, Valerie Masson-Delmotte <Valerie.Masson@cea.fr>, Dominique Raynaud <raynaud@lgge.obs.ujf-grenoble.fr>, jean-claude.duplessy@lsce.cnrs-gif.fr, dolago@uonbi.ac.ke, peltier@atmosp.physics.utoronto.ca, rramesh@prl.res.in, olgasolomina@yandex.ru, derzhang@msn.com, Tim Osborn <t.osborn@uea.ac.uk>, P.Jones@uea.ac.uk, David.Palmer@uea.ac.uk, "Mcgarvie Michael Mr (ACAD)" <M.Mcgarvie@uea.ac.uk>
date: Fri, 16 May 2008 13:02:58 +0200
from: Stefan Rahmstorf <rahmstorf@ozean-klima.de>
subject: Re: Response to Holland - FYI
to: Keith Briffa <k.briffa@uea.ac.uk>

<x-flowed>
Keith, fine with me.
Astonishing that the skeptics scene is still obsessed with the hockey 
stick! I just got an angry mail by someone about it yesterday, who 
claimed IPCC had "withdrawn" the hockey stick, so how could I possibly 
still defend it on my website!

Cheers, Stefan

-- 
Stefan Rahmstorf
www.ozean-klima.de
www.realclimate.org

</x-flowed>