date: Tue May 28 17:24:59 2002 from: Mike Hulme subject: Fwd: schell to: t.d.davies Trevor, Well, the good news is that John is now citing his Tyndall affiliation! The bad news is Tom's reaction to it! TMLW will be even more annoyed if John gets a Royal-Society Wolfson Merit Award - I have just had a meeting with Brian Summers about this and we think we can get an application in my the end of June. Mike Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 09:19:25 -0600 From: Tom Wigley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en To: Mike Hulme CC: t.d.davies@uea.ac.uk, Keith Briffa , Phil Jones Subject: schell Mike, Every time I see things like this I cringe .... ************************************************************************ 2002 BERLIN CONFERENCE ON THE HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE Berlin, 6-7 December 2002 Plenary speakers include Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Oran Young, chair of the IHDP Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change project; and John Schellnhuber, director of PIK and research director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. ************************************************************************ You know I have no respect for this guy. My position is fully justifiable; one just has to look at his background and training, and his publication and citation records. Quite clearly, he has contributed nothing of value to the science. But even a very competent person could not possibly hold down two responsible, full-time jobs like this. Is he being paid only 50% by both institutions? Is he spending 50% of his time at UEA? Has he contributed anything significant to the research or research initiatives/planning of the Tyndall Centre? I ask these questions because of my concerns for UEA, ENV, and the Tyndall Centre, as a Professor in ENV, and to let you know that (unless I can be convinced otherwise) I intend to raise the issue of the continuation of his employment at an ENV Professorial meeting. From what I know, he has not met the contractual obligations of his appointment and so could legally be dismissed. At the very least this issue needs to be discussed. Tom.